Skip to main content

Digital Trends may earn a commission when you buy through links on our site. Why trust us?

The Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power review: perfection, precious

Few streaming series have carried as much weight into their premiere as The Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power, Amazon Studios’ ambitious, ludicrously expensive series set in the world of J.R.R. Tolkien’s Middle-earth saga. Not only is the Prime Video series telling a new story set in one of the fantasy genre’s most seminal — and as such, highly scrutinized — worlds, but its success (or failure) could very well determine the fate of an entire streaming service.

That’s a lot to put on any show, so it’s probably a good thing that the first two episodes of The Rings of Power deliver on all of the project’s potential (and then some).

An elven tower stands over Middle-earth in a scene from The Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power.

Directed by J.A. Bayona (Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom, The Orphanage) from scripts penned by John D. Payne and Patrick McKay, The Rings of Power is set thousands of years before the events of The Hobbit and The Lord of the Rings. The series chronicles the rise of Sauron and the creation of the magical rings that would end the relative peace Middle-earth had enjoyed, forcing men and elves to ally themselves and go to war to save their world.

While the series’ cast is largely composed of characters not present in The Hobbit or The Lord of the Rings, one of the primary arcs in the show’s early episodes is led by young versions of two important figures in those sagas: The elves Galadriel and Elrond. Morfydd Clark (Saint Maud) portrays Galadriel, an elven commander obsessed with rooting out evil forces in Middle-earth, while Robert Aramayo (Behind Her Eyes) plays Elrond, a brilliant elven politician and scholar.

The pair are joined by Markella Kavenagh as Nori Brandyfoot, a member of the diminutive, nomadic, and secretive “Harfoot” race, who — like many of the Hobbits in later years — becomes a little figure caught up in a big adventure after an encounter with a mysterious stranger. Ismael Cruz Cordova takes on the role of Arondir, an elven soldier in love with a human woman, played by Homeland actress Nazanin Boniadi.

Morfydd Clark as Galadriel stands in armor in a scene from The Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power.

Each of the first two episodes of The Rings of Power does an impressive job of replicating the tone and scope of the live-action, Tolkien-inspired film franchises that preceded the series. On one hand, it shouldn’t come as too much of a surprise, given the involvement of visual effects studio Weta FX, composer Howard Shore, and many of the other, behind-the-scenes creative teams who worked on The Hobbit and/or The Lord of the Rings films. But the grandeur of The Rings of Power still feels special within the framework of a series and makes each episode feel like a cinematic feature best enjoyed on the biggest screen possible.

More on The Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power

In this and other ways, The Rings of Power feels more akin to The Lord of the Rings films than The Hobbit, too — particularly as its story unfolds across multiple, parallel narratives. The characters are separated by wide distances in the show’s introductory story arc, but much like the initially distant adventures of the characters in The Lord of the Rings, their stories manage to be individually entertaining even as the point of them intersecting grows more imminent.

Like the films, The Rings of Power doesn’t waste any time introducing a host of characters that seem certain to hold your interest as they mix and mingle around Middle-earth.

Robert Aramayo as Elrond crouches in a field in a scene from The Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power.

Along with replicating the scale and narrative architecture of The Lord of the Rings films, the Amazon series also delivers an experience that feels tonally familiar to those features, too.

Great fantasy sagas find the balance between dire (and often world-threatening) stakes and heroes whose journey never gets mired in the bleakness of the events unfolding around them. The Rings of Power channels that relationship wonderfully with heroes whose noble sense of purpose outshines the darkness of the forces aligning against them.

While it might seem unremarkable, that element of The Rings of Power feels fresh and unique amid the overwhelming bleakness that projects like Game of Thrones and House of the Dragon have brought to the medieval fantasy genre in recent years.

Ismael Cruz Cordova as Arondir stares into the eyes of a human woman in a scene from The Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power.

Whether The Rings of Power can accomplish all that’s expected — and hoped — of it for both Amazon Studios remains to be seen, but the series’ first two episodes suggest it has the potential to be every bit the worthy successor to the film saga fans are hoping for. Grand in its ambition, spectacle, scope, and maybe most importantly, execution, The Rings of Power is off to an impressive start.

Amazon’s The Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power premieres Friday, September 2, on Prime Video streaming service.

Topics
Rick Marshall
A veteran journalist with more than two decades of experience covering local and national news, arts and entertainment, and…
Operation Seawolf review: nice Nazis? No thanks!
Dolph Lundgren holds onto a pipe inside a U-Boat in a scene from Operation Seawolf.

At a time when anti-Semitic extremists are storming the U.S Capitol, running for office, and declaring war on Jewish people via social media, it might not be the best time for a movie that expects you to sympathize with Nazis. And yet, that hasn't stopped Operation Seawolf from sailing into theaters and on-demand streaming services this month.

The film, which follows the crew of a German U-boat during the waning days of World War II, casts Dolph Lundgren (Rocky IV) as German war hero Capt. Hans Kessler, who's ordered to lead the Nazis' remaining U-boats on a desperate (and likely fatal) mission to attack the U.S. on its own soil. As he and his crew make their way toward New York City in one final bid to turn the tide of war, Kessler finds himself struggling with both the internal politics of the ship and his own sense of duty as the Third Reich crumbles around him.

Read more
Conversations with A Killer: The Jeffrey Dahmer Tapes review: killer’s words yield little insight
A superimposed image of Jeffrey Dahmer in Conversations with a Killer.

It’s spooky season this month, and that means the atrocity mine is currently being plundered by content creators across America. The three-episode docuseries Conversations with a Killer: The Jeffrey Dahmer Tapes, directed by noted documentarian Joe Berlinger (Brother's Keeper, Paradise Lost), is Netflix’s second project tackling the infamous cannibal/necrophiliac/serial killer to debut in a matter of weeks. It follows Ryan Murphy’s 10-hour miniseries drama, Dahmer-Monster: The Jeffrey Dahmer Story. This Dahmer double dose mirrors the barrage of Ted Bundy content that Netflix put out in early 2019, following up the Zac Efron-led drama Extremely Wicked, Shockingly Evil and Vile with the docuseries Conversations with a Killer: The Ted Bundy Tapes (also directed by Berlinger). 

As was the case with Bundy, Netflix is convinced that a multipronged examination of Dahmer could lead to a better understanding of his psychology and motivations, teaching viewers warning signs or expanding our capacity for empathy. Or maybe they recognize that people are addicted to unspeakable tragedies and will do anything they can to maximize viewers’ compulsion for true crime? Attempting to satisfy on all accounts, The Dahmer Tapes oscillates uneasily between character study, social commentary, and pure shock value, landing somewhere in between all three.
In Dahmer's own words

Read more
Amsterdam review: An exhausting, overlong conspiracy thriller
Christian Bale, Margot Robbie, and John David Washington walk through a lobby together in Amsterdam.

Amsterdam could have been forgiven for being a lot of things, but dull is not one of them. The new film from writer-director David O. Russell boasts one of the most impressive ensemble casts of the year and is photographed by Emmanuel Lubezki, one of Hollywood’s premier cinematographers. Beyond that, its kooky premise and even wackier cast of characters open the door for Amsterdam to be the kind of screwball murder mystery that O. Russell, at the very least, seems uniquely well-equipped to make.

Instead, Amsterdam is a disaster of the highest order. It’s a film made up of so many disparate, incongruent parts that it becomes clear very early on in its 134-minute runtime that no one involved — O. Russell most of all — really knew what it is they were making. It is a misfire of epic proportions, a comedic conspiracy thriller that is written like a haphazard screwball comedy but paced like a meandering detective drama. Every element seems to be at odds with another, resulting in a film that is rarely funny but consistently irritating.

Read more