Skip to main content

Low subscriber numbers plague Beats Music

apple to rebrand beats music and push it all ios devices report says colorful

Roughly 100 days after Beats Music’s entry into the cutthroat music-streaming business, the service seems to be grappling with a lagging number of subscribers in the “low six figures,” according to a report by Billboard earlier this week. With Sprint nearing its debut of the “Framily” plan – the package deal resulting from a collaboration with Spotify – increased competition is on the horizon. Is it too late for Beats’ Jimmy Iovine and Dr. Dre to bolster the service in time to remain relevant in the music-streaming game? Its investors appear to still be on board for the long haul, but the numbers don’t paint a pretty picture.

Nearly two months ago Beats Music was able to shore up $100 million in funding aimed at product development, new feature integration, gaining new customers, and new PR moves – all in the name of taking on foes like Spotify. Less than three weeks later, the service was rumored to have snared a fairly low 28,000 subscribers in its debut month, according to “people with knowledge of the situation.” And, most recently, the fledgling music-streamer – hoping to grab more subscribers by making the service available to iOS device users – finally acquiesced and resorted to forfeiting 30 percent of every subscription fee to Apple.

Beats Music’s journey has been an uphill climb, especially considering its massive marketing launch valued in the tens of millions of dollars. Still, it seems to have no shortage of funding. According to The Verge, the company is working on another $100 million cash infusion. And while the service has gained a relatively modest number of paying subscribers since its inception, it’s worth noting that Spotify’s claimed 6 million U.S. subscribers took the company six years to amass. So the problem may not be Beats Music’s viability, but more its timing, entering late in the game into a saturated marketplace.

It’s only been around for three months, but Beats Music has a rough path ahead of it if the service wants to remain relevant and give Spotify, Rdio, TuneIn, iTunes Radio, and others a run for their money. 

Alex Tretbar
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Alex Tretbar, audio/video intern, is a writer, editor, musician, gamer and sci-fi nerd raised on EverQuest and Magic: The…
Dolby Atmos Music through Apple’s $549 headphones left us shrugging
Apple AirPods Max

You don't need a dozen speakers to enjoy Dolby Atmos Music anymore. It's now something anyone with an iPhone, an Apple Music subscription, and a set of headphones can hear. In the not-too-distant future, Android users will be able to get in on the Atmos action, too.

But does Dolby Atmos Music actually sound better? Given Apple's spin, plus my own experiences listening to Atmos Music via Tidal on my home theater system, my expectations were very high for Dolby Atmos via headphones.

Read more
You won’t need 17 speakers to appreciate Dolby Atmos in Apple Music
Vizio Dolby Atmos Soundbar

Shortly after Apple’s announcement yesterday that it will be adding lossless music streaming to Apple Music, Twitter was awash with hot takes, mainly in the form of jeers. “Does anyone care about lossless audio files except for the guy I dated in 2008 who made me a CD of FLAC files,” asked Wired senior writer Lauren Goode.

Goode makes a, ahem, good point: Just how big of a deal is lossless audio anyway? The answer is -- for the vast majority of folks, who happily listen to Spotify or Apple Music on an inexpensive set of wired or wireless earbuds -- not a very big deal at all. In fact, these people probably wouldn’t hear much of a difference even if their headphones could let them hear lossless audio, and the fact is, most wireless headphones simply can’t.

Read more
Why the best device for Apple’s lossless music will be an Android phone
A woman wearing the silver Apple AirPods Max.

In recent days, there’s been some talk of Apple launching a new lossless hi-fi audio tier for its Apple Music streaming music service. The leading evidence for such a move is a few lines of code in iOS 14.6 beta spotted by 9to5Mac. Those lines, which have since been removed, referenced “lossless” audio with the Apple Music app.

Apple certainly has competitive reasons to finally venture into the lossless audio category: Spotify, Tidal, Amazon Music, and Qobuz all offer CD-quality or better-than-CD-quality music, which leaves Apple Music as one of the last holdouts. But I can’t help feeling that Apple has boxed itself into a corner when it comes to lossless audio, and I don’t see an easy way out.
Bring back the jack?

Read more