Skip to main content

Bernie Sanders proposes faster, cheaper broadband with $150B internet overhaul

The digital divide describes the gap between people who have access to the internet and those who don’t. Those included in the divide include people who live in rural areas, as well as those in urban and suburban areas who can’t afford service. Bernie Sanders is the latest Democratic presidential candidate to propose a solution to close that divide. 

On December 6,  Sanders (D-Vermont) released his “High-Speed Internet for All” proposal. It would treat internet service as a utility, like electrical power, with open-access networks that have multiple providers. We already know how to provide affordable, high-speed internet, but conglomerates continue to monopolize the industry and provide the country with inadequate coverage and service,” according to the campaign. 

In 2017, the Institute for Local Self-Reliance found that over 129 million people could only access the internet through a single provider. Millions more don’t have access at all. Bringing in more companies would force them to compete on prices and services, according to the Sanders campaign. It also calls for breaking up “internet service provider and cable monopolies,” saying this would substantially lower prices as well.  

The plan would also change the Federal Communications Commission’s definition of broadband, from 25 megabits per second for download and three Mbps for upload (25/3), to 100/10. Providers would have to offer a “basic” broadband plan at “a regulated rate.” In addition, low-income households would be eligible to have their plans subsidized. 

The proposal recommends offering $150 billion in grants and other assistance to states and communities to build their own “democratically controlled, cooperative, or open access broadband networks.”  Some cities and towns already have municipal networks with broadband in rural areas where other internet service providers (ISPs) have been slow to enter. Chattanooga, Tennessee, for example, was the first U.S. city with a municipal, 1 gigabit-per-second fiber-optic internet service. A  study from Harvard University’s Berkman Klein Center for Internet and Society showed community-owned providers had lower prices and comparable, if not better, service. However, at least 25 states have laws that block or ban such services. 

Other Democratic presidential candidates have already released plans to tackle the internet access problem. Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts wants an $85 billion federal grant plan. South Bend, Indiana, Mayor Pete Buttigieg has an $80 billion Internet For All initiative, and former Vice President Joe Biden has suggested putting $20 billion into rural broadband infrastructure

Jenny McGrath
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Jenny McGrath is a senior writer at Digital Trends covering the intersection of tech and the arts and the environment. Before…
Hackers are pretending to be cybersecurity firm to lock your entire PC
A hacker typing on an Apple MacBook laptop while holding a phone. Both devices show code on their screens.

As hackers come up with new ways to attack, not even trustworthy names can be taken at face value. This time, a ransom-as-a-service (RaaS) attack is being used to impersonate a cybersecurity vendor called Sophos.

The RaaS, referred to as SophosEncrypt, can take hold of your files -- or even your whole PC -- and requires payment to have them decrypted.

Read more
‘World’s largest sundial’ to double as green energy provider
Houston's Arco del Tiempo (Arch of Time).

Houston’s next piece of public art is being described as "the world's largest sundial" and will also produce solar power for the local community.

The striking Arco del Tiempo (Arch of Time) is the creation of Berlin-based artist and architect Riccardo Mariano and will be installed in the Texan city’s East End district in 2024.

Read more
Nvidia’s peace offering isn’t working
Two MSI RTX 4060 Ti 16GB GPUs over a black background.

Nvidia's RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is here, but you wouldn't know it if you didn't follow GPU news closely. It seems that the GPU might just be so far behind some of the best graphics cards that Nvidia isn't advertising it too much. As a result, early benchmarks are scarce.

MSI has released some benchmarks of its own, comparing the 8GB and the 16GB versions of the RTX 4060 Ti. It turns out that the new GPU might actually be slower. Is this why Nvidia didn't even make its own version of this card?

Read more