Skip to main content

Flip MinoHD 2nd Generation (120 Min) Review

Flip MinoHD 2nd Generation (120 Min)
“Lay the Mino HD side-by-side with its competitors, and style-conscious YouTubeographers will pick it up first every time.”
Pros
  • Compact
  • pocketable form factor; captures sharp 720p video; sleek aluminum shell; HDMI Output; larger 2-inch screen
Cons
  • Overpriced relative to competitors; lacks 1080p capture; no image stabilization; no included video output cables; no SD card slot; suffers from severe motion blur; slightly heavier than previous version

Summary

In case you missed Apple’s fall iPod announcements, Apple and Flip Video (now owned by Cisco) are at war. After Steve Jobs treaded into Flip territory by adding a camera to the iPod Nano and implied that it eliminated the need to buy a separate device, Flip headed back to the drawing boards determined the prove that an MP3 player can’t upend the established leader of the up-and-coming mini HD camcorder market. The resulting second-generation Mino HD, introduced a month after the new Nano, adds a bigger screen, more memory, and a more polished design. Will it be enough to fend off a cheaper, smaller device from the likes of Apple? Will it even justify an upgrade from the old version? Let’s find out.

Design

From the outside, not much has changed from Flip to Flip, save for a handful of minor aesthetic refinements. The company has always offered the Mino HD in customizable cases, allowing you to get it skinned in anything from a psychedelic rainbow print to a picture of your dog, but as part of its newfound appeal to Apple fans, the new Mino HD includes one extra option: anodized aluminum. The bright, silky-feeling finish might have been cast directly from a pile of melted down MacBook Pros, which is great as far as we’re concerned. It lends the camcorder a rock-solid feel and lustre the original just didn’t have. You’ll notice a little extra heft, though: weight goes from 3.3 ounces on the old Mino HD to 4 ounces on this version, a sacrifice we’ll gladly take for the tough new shell. Dimensions remain almost identical, but the design has been tweaked ever so slightly to look like it’s been through a rock tumbler: Edges have a smoother finish, and even the buttons on the back have been rounded out and melded into the case for a more seamless look.

Flip Mino HD 120

Hardware

With Apple’s cheapest $149 Nano packing 8GB of storage, Flip was practically obligated to double the Mino HD from 4GB to 8GB in order to match it. But unlike many competitors, it still has no SD slot to add memory or swap cards when one fills up. The stamp-sized 1.5-inch screen on the old model has been discarded in favor of a 2.0-inch model with more resolution, making it just a bit shy of Apple’s 2.2-incher. Of course, the 720p HD sensor on the Mino HD already put the standard-def sensor on the Nano to shame, so it remains for this generation.

Flip Mino HD 120

But while Flip engineers seem to have been busy reacting to Apple, they’ve conveniently ignored other competitors who have plowed forward with new features that put the Mino HD to shame. Kodak’s Zi8, for instance, bests the Mino HD with 1080p resolution, a 2.5-inch screen, optical image stabilization, and even a microphone input jack – all at $180 MSRP. And JVC’s new Picsio GC-FM1 also offers 1080p video, plus 8-megapixel stills, for $200.

Connectivity

The iconic switchblade-like USB jack from all Flip camcorders makes a return on the new Mino HD, and it has gotten even slicker this time around. The chunky plastic collar around the old plug disappears in favor of a clean all-metal version, and the hinge has been been beefed up considerably to give it a much sturdier feel that allayed our worries of it snapping off with a misplaced blow. However, the lack of flexibility can still create issues when plugging it into a crowded row of USB jacks, making us prefer the bendy rubber USB plugs on the Creative VadoHD and Kodak Zi8.

Flip Mino HD 120

Unlike the original Mino HD, which counterintuitively offered a standard-def composite output for viewing its high-def videos, Flip wisely decided to make the switch to HDMI this time around, finally catching up to its lower-priced sibling, the Ultra HD.

Accessories

Like the original Mino HD, the new version comes with a silver wrist lanyard and a suede-like drawstring bag for carrying. However, Flip no longer includes the requisite cables to go with its new video output. You’ll have to buy your own HDMI cable. For $230, we really think this is a bit stingy on Flip’s part, especially when Kodak manages to throw in both standard- and high-def cables with its lower-priced Zi8.

Video Performance

Flip makes no claim to improved video performance with the new version of the Mino HD, but we tested both versions of the camcorder head-to-head to compare. As expected, the new Mino HD retains the sharp detail and clarity of the original, but colors also seem to be tweaked for the better. Images captured with the new Mino HD look slightly more saturated and vibrant, but the effect was subtle enough that we needed to compare identical frames side by side to really notice, and owners of the old Mino HD could probably achieve the same effect with some postprocessing.

As with almost all pocket HD video camcorders, the Mino HD continues to suffer from extreme motion blur when moved too quickly. Even a steady walk will turn its high-def video into a muddy mess.

Conclusion

Lay the Mino HD side-by-side with every one of its pocket-video-cam competitors, and style-conscious YouTubeographers will pick it up first every time. The new aluminum body undoubtedly makes the Mino HD a great-looking and feeling camcorder, which may redeem Flip in the eyes of Apple’s notoriously design-crazy customers. But while it might win a petty battle with a reworked MP3 player, the Mino HD is losing to its real peers like the Kodak Zi8, which trounces the Mino HD in almost every category except style. The original Mino HD justified its price well when it launched nearly a year ago, but Flip has continued to tread water with the product while competitors dash forward at Michael Phelps speed, leaving this lightly polished second-gen device behind the pack.

Pros:

  • Compact, pocketable form factor
  • Captures sharp 720p video
  • Sleek aluminum shell
  • HDMI Output
  • Larger 2-inch screen

Cons:

  • Overpriced relative to competitors
  • Lacks 1080p capture
  • No image stabilization
  • No included video output cables
  • No SD card slot
  • Suffers from severe motion blur
  • Slightly heavier than previous version

Editors' Recommendations

Nick Mokey
As Digital Trends’ Managing Editor, Nick Mokey oversees an editorial team delivering definitive reviews, enlightening…
Hackers are pretending to be cybersecurity firm to lock your entire PC
A hacker typing on an Apple MacBook laptop while holding a phone. Both devices show code on their screens.

As hackers come up with new ways to attack, not even trustworthy names can be taken at face value. This time, a ransom-as-a-service (RaaS) attack is being used to impersonate a cybersecurity vendor called Sophos.

The RaaS, referred to as SophosEncrypt, can take hold of your files -- or even your whole PC -- and requires payment to have them decrypted.

Read more
‘World’s largest sundial’ to double as green energy provider
Houston's Arco del Tiempo (Arch of Time).

Houston’s next piece of public art is being described as "the world's largest sundial" and will also produce solar power for the local community.

The striking Arco del Tiempo (Arch of Time) is the creation of Berlin-based artist and architect Riccardo Mariano and will be installed in the Texan city’s East End district in 2024.

Read more
Nvidia’s peace offering isn’t working
Two MSI RTX 4060 Ti 16GB GPUs over a black background.

Nvidia's RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is here, but you wouldn't know it if you didn't follow GPU news closely. It seems that the GPU might just be so far behind some of the best graphics cards that Nvidia isn't advertising it too much. As a result, early benchmarks are scarce.

MSI has released some benchmarks of its own, comparing the 8GB and the 16GB versions of the RTX 4060 Ti. It turns out that the new GPU might actually be slower. Is this why Nvidia didn't even make its own version of this card?

Read more