Skip to main content

Companies can’t punish employees for critical views on social media

fatal shooting facebook live app
There have been many cautionary tales regarding company employees and social media. Workers have been terminated for a variety of reasons: some for merely criticizing their place of work, while others have been let go for offensive social media posts that have caused controversy and put their employers in a bad light. However, that doesn’t mean workers don’t have rights when it comes to social media.

Many people often misinterpret the Constitution’s protected right to free speech, which prevents the government from silencing citizen’s right to free speech. Private companies are another story – you could be fired for misrepresenting the company on social media; this is why many people are warned about speaking out on social media, as it can even prevent you from getting another job. However, the government has stepped in for workers, as social media is considered protected speech, according to the National Labor Relations Act.

Katie Loehrke, editor at Wisconsin-based compliance resource firm J.J. Keller and Associates, told the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette that workers can discuss aspects of their job without retaliation from their employer. “According to the National Labor Relations Act, what constitutes as protected speech is anything that explicitly discusses terms and conditions of employment – whether it relates to how you’re treated at work, wages, breaks, anything that goes to the terms and conditions of your employment is considered protected,” she said. So, it’s okay to complain about how uncomfortable your desk chair is, but it’s not okay to reveal company secrets.

While employees in the public sector are more free social media-wise, they can still face consequences. According to the Houston Chronicle, there are still some limits for public sector employees and what they can say on social media. “Government employees enjoy protection for statements they make as citizens on issues of public concern, unless the speech hurts the government agency’s ability to function. According to the United States Supreme Court in Garcetti v. Ceballos, the First Amendment does not protect statements that a government employee makes as part of the employee’s official job duties,” the article said.

Editors' Recommendations

Jose Alvarez
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Introduced to tech at a young age, Jose has grown attached to video games in particular. He has covered topics such as…
Twitter CEO claims platform had best day last week
A stylized composite of the Twitter logo.

Twitter CEO Linda Yaccarino tweeted on Monday that despite the current fuss over Meta’s new and very similar Threads app, Twitter had its largest usage day last week.

Subtly including the name of Meta’s new app, which launched to great fanfare last Wednesday, Yaccarino did her best to sing Twitter’s praises, tweeting: “Don’t want to leave you hanging by a thread … but Twitter, you really outdid yourselves! Last week we had our largest usage day since February. There’s only ONE Twitter. You know it. I know it.”

Read more
Meta brings cartoon avatars to video calls on Instagram and Messenger
Meta's cartoon avatars for Instagram and Messenger.

The pandemic was supposed to have made us all comfortable with video calls, but many folks still don’t particularly enjoy the process.

Having to think about what to wear, or how our hair looks, or even fretting about puffy eyes following another bout of hay fever can sometimes be a bit much, even more so if it’s an early-morning call and your brain is still in bed.

Read more
Twitter is now giving money to some of its creators
A lot of white Twitter logos against a blue background.

Some Twitter users are now earning money via ads in the replies to their tweets.

New Twitter owner Elon Musk announced the revenue-sharing program in February, and on Thursday some of those involved have been sharing details of their first payments.

Read more