Skip to main content

Mark Cuban says Apple should remove Twitter from its App Store for violating policy

mark cuban twitter apple
Outspoken entrepreneur Mark Cuban took to Twitter this morning to proclaim that Apple should ban the social network from its App Store.

Cuban, who obviously has no objections with using Twitter himself, asked why Apple hasn’t removed Twitter from its App Store despite the platform violating its UGC and Personal Attack terms. The first tweet in Cuban’s tweetstorm included a screenshot of Apple’s App Store Review Guidelines, reports CNN Money.

https://twitter.com/mcuban/status/675031320364494849

It seems that the Dallas Mavericks owner was referring to clause 14.3 in the “Personal attacks” section that calls for a “filter” to be placed on “objectionable material.” The remainder of the clause regarding “a mechanism for users to flag offensive content, and the ability to block abusive users” already exists on Twitter.

Cuban continued by tweeting that removing Twitter from the App Store for a temporary period will force it to “solve…all objectionable…content issues.” As evidence, he made reference to Instagram’s ability to block nudity on its app. He concluded by questioning Apple’s handling of Twitter in particular.

https://twitter.com/mcuban/status/675032192213458944

https://twitter.com/mcuban/status/675032409516212224

In an effort to seek clarification, CNN Money reached out to Cuban to ask whether his concerns were over ISIS-related accounts, to which he did not respond.

The issue of terrorism-related content did pop up in a short-lived tweet-off between Cuban and Twitter investor, Chris Sacca. In the wake of Cuban’s allegations, Sacca proclaimed the Shark Tank panel member a “freedom” hater and Donald Trump’s future running mate. Cuban responded by stating that Sacca was proving his “troll point.” He later added: “Twitter could be more transparent,” and that he would feel better “knowing terrorist UGC is down in 24 hours.” In Twitter’s defense, Sacca claimed that the service was not the “author of objectionable content” and that it provides “multiple paths for removal of it.”

https://twitter.com/sacca/status/675041855202066432

Twitter has continuously been targeted in regard to the posting of “terrorist content” on the network. As the war against ISIS has escalated, western countries have approached the likes of Twitter and Facebook to remove terrorist rhetoric and combat the spread of radicalization online.

Saqib Shah
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Saqib Shah is a Twitter addict and film fan with an obsessive interest in pop culture trends. In his spare time he can be…
Apple’s first attempt to delay third-party app store payments fails in court
App store icon showing three notifications.

Apple will have to allow third-party developers the ability to link outside the App Store pretty soon. After appealing the ruling in the Epic case that said it had to allow for third-party links and buttons in App Store apps and requesting a denial, the company was met with a refusal by a federal court in Oakland.

By its telling, Apple's motion for a stay was based on a need to protect its customers and developers by building new policies to accommodate the new state of play and remove the prohibition on anti-steering it had enshrined.

Read more
Paddle wants to be first to replace Apple’s in-app billing system for developers
Someone holding the iPhone XR outdoors while it displays apps.

As a result of Apple and Epic's lawsuit, the former company is now restricted from stopping app developers from directing their users to alternate payment methods in their apps. As a result, a solutions provider business, Paddle, has announced a replacement service for Apple's in-app purchase system to go live in December.

"Paddle In-App Purchase is a true like-for-like, drop-in replacement for Apple's IAP, allowing developers to maintain a seamless user experience, without having to pay Apple 30% of every sale," Paddle shared in a press release, adding: "Paddle has a highly competitive fee structure, charging just 10% for transactions under $10, and just 5% on transactions over $10. This means that developers earn more from every purchase. "

Read more
Epic v. Apple case shows just how much of the App Store’s money comes from games
App store icon showing three notifications.

Over the course of the Epic v. Apple case, much has come to light about how both companies generate profit. One of the biggest shocks comes from the closing ruling of the case, which reveals that 70% of the App Store's money comes from games.

This lawsuit was brought by Epic Games in August 2020. The general gist of the case is that Epic added a payment system to Fortnite mobile that allowed players to avoid an extra 30% fee usually applied to App Store purchases, which goes to Apple. In response to the workaround, Apple removed Fortnite from its marketplace, which prompted Epic to take the matter to court.

Read more