Skip to main content

Storify browser extension publicizes private Facebook updates

Facebook graph privacy search 

A word of advice: Just because you’ve published an update on Facebook and set custom privacy settings doesn’t mean that the content will stay private. Point in case, AGBeat reported an inherent flaw in Storify, realized by Julie Pippert, Director of Artful Media Group, which publishes private Facebook posts to a very public, viewable platform. It’s just adding to the mounting evidence that your privacy settings aren’t as secure as you imagine them to be.

Storify relaunched back in November to become as the de facto platform for discovering current events as covered by social media platforms. Users can pull in content from social networks including Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, Instagram, and others to aggregate a stream of content about a particular topic.

The culprit in this case was a third-party Storify browser extension. With the extension, users can pull any content from Facebook and republish it Storify. Facebook adds that Storify isn’t the party at fault here. The company does take measures to block off the republishing of content behind non-public settings.

The flaw allows private posts in Facebook Groups to be made easily visible. And these updates are attributed to the original publisher by name and photo, as well. So not only is the content itself made public, so is the person who said it. 

But all types of content, granted that it’s visible to you it in the first place, is arguably fair grounds for sharing on third-party platforms. And this isn’t necessarily an issue exclusive to Storify.

Facebook’s privacy settings are porous — as is the case with most social networks. You might remember when Randi Zuckerberg, Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s sister, called out her sister’s friend for publicly sharing a harmless, yet intimate candid photo via Twitter (which originated on Facebook) of the Zuckerberg siblings enjoying themselves with friends. The friend in question, while not friends with Randi, noticed the photo in her own News Feed when Randi negligently tagged her sister. But expectedly chalking up the incident to “bad manners,” Randi Zuckerberg brushed off Facebook’s privacy inconsistencies.

As much as privacy settings can be evangelized by Facebook, it takes just a screen shot by a friend or a friend of a friend to publicize your “private” content. Right, Snapchatters?

Francis Bea
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Francis got his first taste of the tech industry in a failed attempt at a startup during his time as a student at the…
Facebook starts merging Instagram, Messenger chat features on iOS, Android
Instagram logo

Facebook has apparently started merging the chat services of Instagram and Messenger on mobile devices, following through with a plan that was revealed in early 2019.

For some people, a notification has popped up on the iOS and Android versions of Instagram, offering "a new way to message" while showing the photo-sharing app's icon alongside Messenger's. The notification, which offers users a choice of updating the app, also lists features such as a new colorful design, emoji reactions, swipe to reply, and the option of chatting with friends on Facebook.

Read more
Facebook now lets businesses charge for online events
facebook paid event image

Facebook is letting businesses charge money for live online events, which it says will help businesses stay afloat as the pandemic keeps customers away from storefronts.

With the new addition to the platform, page owners can host an event on Facebook and charge guests attendance fees.

Read more
Instagram kept pictures and private DMs long after users deleted them
instagram profile

Instagram’s delete buttons may not have functioned as you intended them to in the last year. Independent security researcher Saugat Pokharel discovered that Instagram (via TechCrunch) kept copies of deleted pictures and private direct messages on its servers, even after someone removed them from their account.

Last year, when Pokharel downloaded an archive of his Instagram account’s data, he found that the file also contained images and messages he had deleted more than a year earlier -- suggesting that while these pictures weren’t visible on his profile, they were still present on Instagram parent Facebook’s servers.

Read more