Hubble images a pair of tiny dwarf galaxies

By Georgina Torbet August 3, 2024

hubble dwarf galaxy pair ic3430 potw2431a 1 — ESA/Hubble & NASA, M. Sun

A new image from the Hubble Space Telescope shows a small dwarf galaxy called IC 3430 that’s located 45 million light-years away. This galaxy is classified as both a dwarf galaxy, because of its small size, and an elliptical galaxy, because of its form.

Elliptical galaxies are smooth and featureless, appearing blob-like and diffuse, unlike spiral galaxies, like our Milky Way, which have a distinct structure of a central hub and stretching spiral arms.

Recommended Videos

In this image, you can see the smooth oval shape of IC 3430. Elliptical galaxies are primarily composed of older stars, as they lack the gas required to form new stars, but in this case, you can see a core of hot blue stars in the center of the galaxy. These hot stars are younger, which is a rarity for elliptical galaxies.

This NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope image captures the dwarf irregular galaxy NGC 5238. — This NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope image captures the dwarf irregular galaxy NGC 5238. ESA/Hubble & NASA, F. Annibali

This other recent Hubble image also shows a dwarf galaxy, one called NGC 5238. This one is located 14.5 million light-years away, but has a different and more complex type of structure. It has glowing spots of brighter areas, which are groups of stars called globular clusters.

The structure of this galaxy gives clues to its history. Astronomers think that the structure comes from a historical merger, when another galaxy wandered too close to this galaxy and the two merged into one. This caused pockets of stars to form due to gravitational disturbances pushing and pulling at the gas.

Indications of a historical merger include groups of stars within a galaxy with different chemical properties, suggesting they formed in a different environment from their neighbors. By studying smaller galaxies like this one, astronomers can build up their understanding of how galaxies form and merge.

“One main theory of galaxy evolution is that galaxies formed ‘bottom-up’ in a hierarchical fashion: star clusters and small galaxies were the first to form out of gas and dark matter,” Hubble scientists explain in a press release accompanying this image. “Over time, gravity gradually assembled these smaller objects into galaxy clusters and superclusters, which explains the shape of the largest structures we see in the universe today.”

Topics

Tech News

Georgina Torbet

Space Writer

Georgina has been the space writer at Digital Trends space writer for six years, covering human space exploration, planetary…

Space

James Webb spots another pair of galaxies forming a question mark

The galaxy cluster MACS-J0417.5-1154 is so massive it is warping the fabric of space-time and distorting the appearance of galaxies behind it, an effect known as gravitational lensing. This natural phenomenon magnifies distant galaxies and can also make them appear in an image multiple times, as NASA’s James Webb Space Telescope saw here.

The internet had a lot of fun last year when eagle-eyed viewers spotted a galaxy that looked like a question mark in an image from the James Webb Space Telescope. Now, Webb has stumbled across another questioning galaxy, and the reasons for its unusual shape reveal an important fact about how the telescope looks at some of the most distant galaxies ever observed.

The new question mark-shaped galaxy is part of an image of galaxy cluster MACS-J0417.5-1154, which is so massive that it distorts space-time. Extremely massive objects -- in this case, a cluster of many galaxies -- exert so much gravitational force that they bend space, so the light traveling past these objects is stretched. It's similar using a magnifying glass. In some cases, this effect, called gravitational lensing, can even make the same galaxy appear multiple times in different places within one image.

Space

James Webb is explaining the puzzle of some of the earliest galaxies

This image shows a small portion of the field observed by NASA’s James Webb Space Telescope’s NIRCam (Near-Infrared Camera) for the Cosmic Evolution Early Release Science (CEERS) survey. It is filled with galaxies. The light from some of them has traveled for over 13 billion years to reach the telescope.

From practically the moment it was turned on, the James Webb Space Telescope has been shaking cosmology. In some of its very earliest observations, the telescope was able to look back at some of the earliest galaxies ever observed, and it found something odd: These galaxies were much brighter than anyone had predicted. Even when the telescope's instruments were carefully calibrated over the few weeks after beginning operations, the discrepancy remained. It seemed like the early universe was a much busier, brighter place than expected, and no one knew why.

This wasn't a minor issue. The fact early galaxies appeared to be bigger or brighter than model predicted meant that something was off about the way we understood the early universe. The findings were even considered "universe breaking." Now, though, new research suggests that the universe isn't broken -- it's just that there were early black holes playing tricks.

Space

Event Horizon Telescope can now take images of black holes that are 50% sharper

Illustration of the highest-resolution detections ever made from the surface of Earth

The Event Horizon Telescope project, the group that took the first-ever image of a black hole, has made another historic breakthrough, making the highest-ever resolution observations of space taken from the Earth's surface. The project uses facilities around the globe to turn the Earth itself into a giant observatory, which is capable of taking highly precise measurements of distant galaxies.

The latest observations made use of the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA), a large array of radio telescopes located in Chile, as well as other facilities in Spain, France, and Hawaii. To get higher-resolution images than previous observations, scientists weren't able to make the telescope bigger -- as it was already the size of the Earth -- so they observed at a higher frequency instead.