Skip to main content

Airport X-ray body scanners banned in Europe over cancer risks

Backscatter-Scanner
Image used with permission by copyright holder

The European Union announced this week that it will ban the use of X-ray body scanners in airports across the EU due to “health and safety” concerns. The same security scanners, which are used to find firearms and explosives hidden on passengers’ bodies, will still be used at airports in the US.

A ProPublica/PBS NewsHour report from earlier this month exposed the health risks associated with the use of these types of security scanners, which use “backscatter” ionizing radiation to detect foreign materials on the human body. While the radiation used in the scanners is low, it has been found to damage DNA, and could potentially cause cancer in a small number of travelers, out of the hundreds of millions of passengers who fly each year.

Recommended Videos

In addition to the rise in health concerns associated with their use, backscatter body scanners have been criticized for their invasion of privacy, since they create images that essentially reveal passengers’ naked bodies.

Despite the fact that the Food and Drug Administration declared in a 1998 report “that humans shouldn’t be X-rayed unless there is a medical benefit,” the FDA released a letter last week refuting the ProPublica/PBS investigation, which estimated that six to 100 Americans could develop cancer from backscatter scanners each year, saying that the number is closer to 1 in every 400 million.

In European airports, X-ray scanners will be replaced with millimeter-wave scanners, which use a low-frequency radio wave instead of radiation. US airports will continue to use both types of scanners.

According to Forbes, the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) countered the EU’s decision to ditch X-ray scanners, saying that this type of scanner had been used to find more than 300 dangerous items on passengers since January 2010.

Let’s assume a worst-case scenario for a moment: The TSA says it found 300 dangerous items (whatever that means) in about two years, which averages out to 150 dangerous items each year. If 100 people a year develop cancer due to the use of backscatter scanners, that equals out to 1.5 dangerous items found for every one person who gets freakin’ cancer!

If, instead, only six people get cancer — the low end of the ProPublica/PBS estimate — that still means the TSA only discovers 25 dangerous items per person (who now has cancer). That doesn’t exactly seem like a fair trade-off, especially considering that most of the items they found were probably not all dirty bombs and rocket launchers.

Currently, about 500 body scanners, of both the backscatter and millimeter-wave variety, are in use in airports across the US. The TSA plans to deploy a total of 1,800 security scanners over the next three years.

[Image via] – Updated with additional information at 9:30am ET

Andrew Couts
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Features Editor for Digital Trends, Andrew Couts covers a wide swath of consumer technology topics, with particular focus on…
How to change margins in Google Docs
Laptop Working from Home

When you create a document in Google Docs, you may need to adjust the space between the edge of the page and the content --- the margins. For instance, many professors have requirements for the margin sizes you must use for college papers.

You can easily change the left, right, top, and bottom margins in Google Docs and have a few different ways to do it.

Read more
What is Microsoft Teams? How to use the collaboration app
A close-up of someone using Microsoft Teams on a laptop for a videoconference.

Online team collaboration is the new norm as companies spread their workforce across the globe. Gone are the days of primarily relying on group emails, as teams can now work together in real time using an instant chat-style interface, no matter where they are.

Using Microsoft Teams affords video conferencing, real-time discussions, document sharing and editing, and more for companies and corporations. It's one of many collaboration tools designed to bring company workers together in an online space. It’s not designed for communicating with family and friends, but for colleagues and clients.

Read more
Microsoft Word vs. Google Docs
A person using a laptop that displays various Microsoft Office apps.

For the last few decades, Microsoft Word has been the de facto standard for word processors across the working world. That's finally starting to shift, and it looks like one of Google's productivity apps is the heir apparent. The company's Google Docs solution (or to be specific, the integrated word processor) is cross-platform and interoperable, automatically syncs, is easily shareable, and perhaps best of all, is free.

However, using Google Docs proves it still has a long way to go before it can match all of Word's features -- Microsoft has been developing its word processor for over 30 years, after all, and millions still use Microsoft Word. Will Google Docs' low barrier to entry and cross-platform functionality win out? Let's break down each word processor in terms of features and capabilities to help you determine which is best for your needs.
How does each word processing program compare?
To put it lightly, Microsoft Word has an incredible advantage over Google Docs in terms of raw technical capability. From relatively humble beginnings in the 1980s, Microsoft has added new tools and options in each successive version. Most of the essential editing tools are available in Google Docs, but users who are used to Word will find it limited.

Read more