Skip to main content

The Washington Post will roll out a paywall this summer

Washington Post
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Announced by the paper earlier today, the Washington Post will follow the example set by the New York Times and launch an online paywall for frequent visitors starting during summer 2013. After the paywall is flipped on, readers will be limited to twenty articles or multimedia features for free each month. Once the limit is hit, it’s likely that the Washington Post site will display an overlay requesting that the user sign up for a monthly subscription.

washington post paperAt this time, management at the Washington Post have not decided on the monthly subscription price for digital readers or if there will be tiered prices for readers using mobile devices like smartphones or tablets. According to the Washington Business Journal, the Washington Post has been surveying readers in the Washington D.C. area. Prices within the survey range from unlimited Web access for approximately $8 a month up to unlimited Web access with seven-day print delivery for about $25 a month.

Recommended Videos

When asked about the launch of the paywall, Washington Post publisher Katharine Weymouth stated “News consumers are savvy; they understand the high cost of a top-quality news gathering operation and the importance of maintaining the kind of in-depth reporting for which The Post is known. Our digital package is a valuable one, and we are going to ask our readers to pay for it and help support our news gathering as they have done for many years with the print edition.”

washington-post-on-ipadWhile a report during December 2012 noted that the Washington Post was looking into different online paywall systems, the newspaper had previously held the position that an online paywall wouldn’t be effective since over ninety percent of online readers were not located within Washington D.C.. Basically, limiting digital access to the site wouldn’t necessarily help increase subscription rates of the print version of the newspaper. 

Much like other paywall structures, subscribers to the print version of the Washington Post will be able to continue accessing the online site without any extra cost. In addition, the paywall will not be active for computers within educational, government or military institutions. For instance, if a teacher needs to access the Washington Post to support a lesson, they will be able to access the site without having to subscribe to the digital version of the newspaper. In regards to sections of the site that will be free to access for all, the home page, section pages and classified advertisements will still be open without a subscription.

While the paywall has the potential to generate more monthly revenue for the newspaper, it could also have an adverse effect on digital advertising. At the moment, digital advertising generates approximately twenty percent of the total advertising revenue for the paper. If people are turned away due to a paywall, pageviews of those display ads could decrease over time and ultimately become less effective for advertisers. 

In order to spur subscriptions to the digital version of the newspaper, developers at the Washington Post plan to launch a new version of the site customized for the iPad. Beyond the Apple tablet, there have been no announcements for a mobile application specifically built for Android tablets. 

Mike Flacy
By day, I'm the content and social media manager for High-Def Digest, Steve's Digicams and The CheckOut on Ben's Bargains…
How to change margins in Google Docs
Laptop Working from Home

When you create a document in Google Docs, you may need to adjust the space between the edge of the page and the content --- the margins. For instance, many professors have requirements for the margin sizes you must use for college papers.

You can easily change the left, right, top, and bottom margins in Google Docs and have a few different ways to do it.

Read more
What is Microsoft Teams? How to use the collaboration app
A close-up of someone using Microsoft Teams on a laptop for a videoconference.

Online team collaboration is the new norm as companies spread their workforce across the globe. Gone are the days of primarily relying on group emails, as teams can now work together in real time using an instant chat-style interface, no matter where they are.

Using Microsoft Teams affords video conferencing, real-time discussions, document sharing and editing, and more for companies and corporations. It's one of many collaboration tools designed to bring company workers together in an online space. It’s not designed for communicating with family and friends, but for colleagues and clients.

Read more
Microsoft Word vs. Google Docs
A person using a laptop that displays various Microsoft Office apps.

For the last few decades, Microsoft Word has been the de facto standard for word processors across the working world. That's finally starting to shift, and it looks like one of Google's productivity apps is the heir apparent. The company's Google Docs solution (or to be specific, the integrated word processor) is cross-platform and interoperable, automatically syncs, is easily shareable, and perhaps best of all, is free.

However, using Google Docs proves it still has a long way to go before it can match all of Word's features -- Microsoft has been developing its word processor for over 30 years, after all, and millions still use Microsoft Word. Will Google Docs' low barrier to entry and cross-platform functionality win out? Let's break down each word processor in terms of features and capabilities to help you determine which is best for your needs.
How does each word processing program compare?
To put it lightly, Microsoft Word has an incredible advantage over Google Docs in terms of raw technical capability. From relatively humble beginnings in the 1980s, Microsoft has added new tools and options in each successive version. Most of the essential editing tools are available in Google Docs, but users who are used to Word will find it limited.

Read more